Developing Tomorrow's Advocates: Meet our Summer 2026 Interns

Ashley Mills • June 12, 2026

The Edmond Firm welcomes Its 2026 Summer Interns.

The Edmond Firm poster: “Meet the interns” with three staff photos and names, “Summer 2021!”

The Edmond Firm Welcomes Its 2026 Summer Interns

At The Edmond Firm, we believe that investing in the next generation of legal professionals is an investment in the future of justice. Each summer, we are proud to provide aspiring attorneys and future leaders with hands-on experience, mentorship, and exposure to the legal profession at the highest level.

This year, we are excited to welcome three outstanding students to our 2026 Summer Internship Program: Arsula Clark, Amelia Anderson, and Nicholas Sartin. Each brings a unique perspective, impressive academic achievements, and a passion for serving others.

Arsula Clark

Arsula Clark, 27, is currently attending John Marshall Law School and joins The Edmond Firm with a strong desire to learn from accomplished legal professionals.

When asked why she chose The Edmond Firm, Arsula shared that she wanted the opportunity to work with "prestigious attorneys with both dual doctorate degrees."

The firm's unique combination of legal and medical expertise offers an unparalleled learning environment for aspiring attorneys, particularly in areas such as medical malpractice, catastrophic personal injury, wrongful death, and complex civil litigation. Throughout her internship, Arsula will gain valuable insight into case strategy, legal research, client advocacy, and trial preparation.

Amelia Anderson

Amelia Anderson, 21, is a student at Spelman College, where she is pursuing a degree in Political Science with a minor in Public Health.

Amelia's academic interests reflect a commitment to understanding the intersection between policy, public health, and the legal system. Her studies have equipped her with a broad perspective on the societal issues that impact individuals and communities, making her a valuable addition to our summer team.

Through her internship experience, Amelia will have the opportunity to observe how legal advocacy can create meaningful change for those who have suffered harm due to negligence and wrongdoing.

Nicholas Sartin

Nicholas Sartin, 21, is a graduate of Morehouse College and is currently attending Mercer Law School.

Nicholas is driven by a desire to advocate for marginalized communities and individuals whose voices often go unheard. His commitment to service and justice aligns closely with The Edmond Firm's mission of standing up for those who have been harmed through negligence and misconduct.

As an intern, Nicholas will gain practical experience in legal advocacy while learning how compassionate representation and strategic litigation can help clients navigate some of the most difficult moments of their lives.

Building the Future of the Legal Profession

At The Edmond Firm, mentorship is more than a summer program. It is a core value. We are committed to helping aspiring legal professionals develop the skills, knowledge, and confidence necessary to become effective advocates and leaders in their communities.

We are honored to welcome Arsula, Amelia, and Nicholas to our team this summer and look forward to supporting their professional growth as they continue their journeys in law and public service.

Please join us in welcoming our 2026 Summer Interns to The Edmond Firm.

By Ashley Mills August 31, 2026
Wrong Drug Injected Into Patients’ Spines: Nashville Hospital Medication Error Injures Four Patients preparing for joint-replacement surgery place extraordinary trust in their healthcare providers. They expect the medications selected, prepared, labeled, verified, and administered during their procedures to be correct. On August 14, 2026, that system reportedly failed at Ascension Saint Thomas Hospital Midtown in Nashville. According to the hospital, four patients scheduled for joint-replacement procedures mistakenly received potassium phosphate instead of mepivacaine, the anesthetic intended for their spinal injections. All four patients experienced adverse health reactions. One publicly identified patient, 72-year-old Glenda Dorton, was reportedly left unable to feel or move her body from the chest down. The hospital has acknowledged that a medication error occurred in its pharmacy, apologized for the resulting harm, and announced several corrective measures. State and federal regulators have reviewed the incident, and the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation opened an investigation following a referral from the Tennessee Health Facilities Commission. For patients and families, this case raises a critical question: How can the wrong medication pass through multiple layers of a hospital’s safety system and reach a patient’s spine? What Happened at Ascension Saint Thomas Midtown? Seven patients were reportedly scheduled for joint-replacement surgery at Ascension Saint Thomas Midtown on August 14. The hospital later confirmed that four of those patients received the wrong medication. Instead of receiving mepivacaine, a local anesthetic used to block pain, the patients were administered potassium phosphate. The medication was reportedly delivered through spinal injections as part of their surgical care. Ascension described the event as an isolated pharmacy medication error and stated that a comprehensive review determined that no additional patients were affected. The hospital also confirmed that the four patients experienced adverse reactions and received immediate medical treatment. One Patient Reportedly Awoke Unable to Move Glenda Dorton, a 72-year-old woman from Centerville, Tennessee, was undergoing knee-replacement surgery when she allegedly received the incorrect medication. According to statements her family provided to news organizations, the procedure initially appeared to have gone as expected. When Dorton awakened, however, she reportedly could not feel or move anything from approximately her chest—or sternum—down. She was transferred to another Ascension facility, where physicians reportedly performed an emergency procedure to drain her spinal fluid. She was also placed on a ventilator. Her family reported that she was diagnosed with a spinal cord injury around the T6 level. The hospital has acknowledged that four patients were harmed but has not publicly confirmed the individual patients’ diagnoses or long-term prognoses. Public information concerning the conditions of the other three patients remains limited. Why Is a Medication Error Involving the Spine So Dangerous? Spinal anesthesia involves placing medication near the nerves responsible for sensation and movement. Because the medication is delivered into a highly sensitive area, accuracy is essential. Mepivacaine and potassium phosphate are not interchangeable. Mepivacaine is a local anesthetic intended to interrupt nerve signals and control pain during certain procedures. Potassium phosphate is generally used to treat or prevent low phosphate levels under carefully controlled medical circumstances. When an unintended substance is introduced into or around the spinal space, it may damage neural tissue and disrupt the functions controlled by the spinal cord. Potential consequences may include: Severe neurological injury Loss of sensation Partial or complete paralysis Respiratory complications Loss of bowel or bladder function Chronic pain Reduced mobility Loss of independence The need for lifelong rehabilitation or supportive care The severity and permanence of an injury depend on multiple factors, including the substance involved, its concentration and dosage, the injection site, the patient’s condition, and how quickly the error is recognized and treated. The Hospital Acknowledged a Pharmacy Error Ascension Saint Thomas stated that its review traced the mistake to an event within the hospital pharmacy. Its public statement identified potassium phosphate as the medication mistakenly supplied in place of mepivacaine. The hospital apologized to the patients and families and said its clinical teams were continuing to provide dedicated care. Ascension also stated that it self-reported the incident to state regulators after identifying the error. The hospital subsequently announced several changes to its pharmacy and medication-safety procedures. Those measures reportedly include: Separating and distinctly marking high-alert medications Creating mandatory “hard stop” procedures when a spinal-medication scan produces an alert Requiring escalation and independent verification before proceeding Requiring a second trained pharmacist to conduct final visual and physical checks Engaging outside quality experts to review and validate the corrective-action plan These safeguards are important because serious medication errors rarely result from a single isolated action. They may involve breakdowns in storage, selection, labeling, scanning, verification, communication, or administration. How Do Wrong-Drug Errors Reach Patients? Hospitals generally use several layers of protection to prevent medication errors. A medication may pass through prescribing, pharmacy preparation, labeling, dispensing, transportation, storage, scanning, verification, and administration before it reaches a patient. An error at any one stage should ideally be caught at another. When the wrong medication is administered, investigators may need to determine whether multiple defenses failed. Potential contributing issues may include: Similar packaging or labeling Medications stored too closely together Incorrect selection from pharmacy inventory Improper preparation or compounding Incomplete or inaccurate labeling Barcode-scanning failures or overridden alerts Failure to perform an independent double-check Communication breakdowns between pharmacy and clinical teams Inadequate staffing or excessive workload Insufficient training or supervision Policies that existed on paper but were not consistently followed Technology that failed to distinguish between incompatible medications A meaningful investigation should examine the entire medication-use system—not simply identify the last person who handled the drug. Why “High-Alert” Medication Safeguards Matter Some medications present an elevated risk of catastrophic harm if they are selected or administered incorrectly. Hospitals may designate these drugs as high-alert medications and implement additional safeguards around their storage and use. Those protections can include physical separation, distinctive warning labels, restricted access, barcode verification, electronic alerts, and mandatory review by a second qualified professional. Ascension’s decision to implement isolated storage and independent dual verification after the incident suggests that these safeguards are central to preventing a similar event. However, determining exactly why the existing system failed will require reviewing the conditions and procedures in place before the four patients were injured. Corrective action after an error is essential. It does not erase the harm already suffered or answer whether reasonable precautions could have prevented it. State and Federal Authorities Are Reviewing the Incident The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation opened an investigation after receiving information from the Tennessee Health Facilities Commission. News reports indicate that the investigation remains active. Ascension has also received a survey report from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services concerning the pharmacy event. The hospital said it is cooperating with state and federal surveyors and takes the findings seriously. An investigation does not, by itself, establish criminal or civil liability. The legal system distinguishes among an unintended mistake, professional negligence, reckless conduct, and an institutional failure to maintain adequate safety systems. No criminal charges had been publicly announced at the time of publication. Is a Hospital Responsible for a Pharmacy Medication Error? A hospital may potentially be held legally responsible when the negligence of its employees, pharmacy personnel, policies, technology, or medication-management systems causes a patient’s injury. Depending on the facts and applicable law, responsibility may involve: The hospital or healthcare system A hospital pharmacy Pharmacists or pharmacy technicians Nurses or other clinical personnel Physicians or anesthesia providers Outside medication suppliers Drug-packaging or labeling companies Technology vendors responsible for defective safety systems The existence of a serious injury does not automatically prove medical malpractice. A successful claim generally requires evidence that a healthcare provider or institution failed to meet the applicable standard of care and that the failure caused or substantially contributed to the patient’s injuries. When a hospital has already acknowledged that the wrong medication was administered, major questions may remain regarding causation, institutional responsibility, the extent of each patient’s injuries, and the compensation necessary to address their future needs. The True Cost of a Catastrophic Medication Error The consequences of paralysis or a serious spinal cord injury extend far beyond the initial hospitalization. An injured patient may require: Emergency and intensive care Additional surgeries Inpatient rehabilitation Physical and occupational therapy Respiratory support Mobility equipment Home and vehicle modifications In-home nursing or attendant care Treatment for chronic pain Psychological support Assistance with daily activities Ongoing medical monitoring Replacement of lost income Long-term or lifetime care A catastrophic-injury case must evaluate not only the bills a patient has already received but also the medical, financial, and personal impact the injury is expected to have over the remainder of the patient’s life. That evaluation may require testimony from physicians, rehabilitation specialists, life-care planners, economists, vocational experts, and other qualified professionals. What Should Families Do After a Suspected Medication Error? Families may receive incomplete or changing information immediately after a serious medical event. Hospitals may conduct internal investigations, but patients should not assume that an internal review will preserve every fact necessary for an independent legal claim. Patients and families should consider taking the following steps: Request complete medical and pharmacy records Preserve medication lists and discharge instructions Document what healthcare providers said about the error Write down a detailed timeline while events remain fresh Save photographs, videos, bills, and correspondence Identify family members or other witnesses who were present Avoid signing releases without understanding their effect Consult an experienced medical-malpractice attorney promptly Evidence may include pharmacy records, medication-administration records, barcode scans, electronic alerts, surveillance footage, staffing information, internal policies, incident reports, and communications among pharmacy, nursing, surgical, and anesthesia personnel. Some of that evidence may not remain available indefinitely. What This Nashville Case Means for Georgia Patients Although this incident occurred in Tennessee, medication errors can occur in hospitals, pharmacies, surgical centers, nursing facilities, and clinics throughout Georgia. Georgia medical-malpractice claims are governed by specific procedural rules and filing deadlines. They may also require qualified expert review before a lawsuit can proceed. When a medication error produces paralysis, neurological damage, respiratory failure, or another catastrophic injury, early investigation is critical. The central questions may include: What medication was ordered? What medication was prepared and dispensed? How was it labeled and stored? Were barcode warnings generated? Were any warnings ignored or overridden? Was an independent verification required? Who had responsibility at each stage? When was the error discovered? Could earlier intervention have reduced the harm? What care will the patient require in the future? Answers to those questions can reveal whether an individual mistake, a defective process, or a broader institutional failure caused the patient’s injuries. Patient Safety Requires More Than an Apology Ascension’s apology and corrective measures acknowledge the seriousness of what occurred. But for patients living with potentially permanent injuries, an apology cannot restore mobility, independence, health, or peace of mind. Hospitals have a responsibility to build medication systems that anticipate human error and prevent a single mistake from reaching a patient. When those systems fail, accountability matters—not only for the people harmed, but also for every patient who enters a hospital expecting safe care. Injured by a Medication Error? Contact The Edmond Firm If you or someone you love suffered paralysis, neurological damage, respiratory failure, or another serious injury because the wrong medication was administered, you deserve a clear explanation of what happened. The Edmond Firm brings extensive legal experience and meaningful medical insight to complex medical-malpractice and catastrophic-injury cases. We examine the complete chain of care, identify the individuals and institutions responsible, consult qualified experts, and pursue the compensation our clients need to move forward. Contact The Edmond Firm to request a confidential case review at no cost. Attorney’s fees are collected only if compensation is recovered, subject to the terms of the representation agreement. When negligence occurs, “I’m sorry” is not enough. This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or medical advice. Results depend on the facts and law applicable to each case. Reading this article or contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By Ashley Mills August 31, 2026
Hospital Allegedly Dismissed Father’s Asthma Emergency Before His Death
malpractice attorneys
August 19, 2026
Understanding the timeline of a malpractice case isn't always straightforward. Join your local malpractice attorneys as we walk through the process with you!
medical malpractice lawyers
July 22, 2026
Medical malpractice lawyers face shifting legal strategies and rising insurance costs as nuclear verdicts dramatically reshape claims.
By Ashley Mills July 14, 2026
Injured in a commercial trucking accident in Atlanta or elsewhere in Georgia? Learn who may be responsible, what evidence matters, and how The Edmond Firm can help.
By Ashley Mills June 23, 2026
You'll find The Edmond Firm where medicine meets the law.
malpractice law
June 18, 2026
Ultimately, proficiency in malpractice law provides clients with the advocacy necessary to challenge powerful medical institutions and insurance corporations.
medical malpractice attorney
May 21, 2026
The road to justice after a healthcare error can be long and complex. See what to expect and why having a medical malpractice attorney is essential for success.
medical malpractice lawyer
February 23, 2026
Discover 7 reasons why you should never settle without consulting a medical malpractice lawyer to protect your rights and claim.
malpractice lawyer
January 23, 2026
If you or a loved one has suffered due to professional malpractice, it's important to immediately contact a malpractice lawyer. Keep reading to learn more.