Tragedy after hardworking dad, 35, was accused of FAKING severe asthma attack by hospital staff

Ashley Mills • August 31, 2026

Hospital Allegedly Dismissed Father’s Asthma Emergency Before His Death

“I Can’t Breathe”: Father’s Death After Asthma Emergency Leads to Reported $15 Million Settlement

Asthma affects millions of Americans, but familiarity with the condition should never be mistaken for harmlessness. A severe asthma attack can rapidly restrict the body’s oxygen supply, creating a life-threatening medical emergency that demands prompt evaluation and treatment.

The death of 35-year-old father Jerome White illustrates what can be at stake when a patient experiencing respiratory distress is allegedly dismissed instead of receiving the urgent attention his condition requires.

According to published reports, White sought treatment at Cooper University Hospital in Camden, New Jersey, during a severe asthma attack on June 3, 2020. His family later reached a reported $15 million wrongful-death settlement with the hospital and Camden County. The agreement reportedly contained no admission of wrongdoing.

A Patient Reportedly Pleaded for Help

White, who reportedly had a lifelong history of severe asthma, arrived at Cooper University Hospital struggling to breathe. Reports indicate that he was evaluated and discharged even as he continued saying that he could not breathe.

After leaving the emergency department, White remained immediately outside the hospital. According to reporting based on a police incident report, sheriff’s officers observed that his condition appeared to be deteriorating and approached hospital staff for assistance.

An emergency-room staff member allegedly responded that White frequently visited the hospital and “pretends to be sick.”

Moments later, White reportedly collapsed. His body went limp, and his lips began turning blue—an alarming indication that his body was not receiving adequate oxygen. Officers rendered aid and helped return him to the emergency department, but White never recovered from the resulting brain injury.

He died on June 19, 2020, sixteen days after seeking emergency care. His reported causes of death included anoxic encephalopathy, cardiac arrest, and severe asthma.

Behind those clinical terms was a devastating human loss: a 35-year-old man whose son was reportedly only 14 when his father died.

The Reported $15 Million Wrongful-Death Settlement

White’s family pursued claims arising from the circumstances surrounding his death. According to published reports, the matter ultimately resulted in a confidential $15 million settlement involving Cooper University Hospital and Camden County.

The hospital reportedly contributed $12 million, while Camden County contributed $3 million. A portion of the recovery reportedly funded a trust for White’s son.

Because the matter was resolved confidentially, the full terms are not publicly available. Cooper University Health Care declined to discuss the case further, citing the settlement’s confidentiality provisions. The agreement reportedly did not include an admission of wrongdoing.

A settlement cannot restore the life that was lost. It may, however, provide financial security for surviving family members, recognize the magnitude of their loss, and impose a measure of civil accountability.

Respiratory Distress Demands Immediate Attention

Severe respiratory distress can progress rapidly. A patient who cannot breathe may suffer cardiac arrest, permanent brain damage, or death if the brain and other organs remain deprived of oxygen.

Emergency personnel must evaluate a patient’s current symptoms and clinical condition. A history of frequent emergency-room visits does not make a new episode harmless. Nor should assumptions about a patient’s behavior replace an appropriate medical screening.

When a person repeatedly says that they cannot breathe, the urgency of the situation should be determined through a careful medical assessment—not personal judgment.

The Danger of Dismissing a Patient

White’s case raises an issue that extends beyond asthma: the danger of allowing assumptions about a patient to influence medical care.

Patients with chronic illnesses may visit emergency departments multiple times. Some may communicate their distress in ways staff consider difficult or familiar. Others may have medical, mental-health, or substance-use histories that create conscious or unconscious bias.

None of those circumstances eliminates the need to evaluate potentially life-threatening symptoms.

When medical professionals characterize a patient as exaggerating, seeking attention, or “pretending,” they risk allowing a subjective judgment to interfere with objective clinical assessment. In a respiratory emergency, that delay can have irreversible consequences.

Hospitals Have Duties to Emergency Patients

Hospitals and emergency-care professionals are expected to respond appropriately when a patient presents with signs of a medical emergency. The applicable legal duties depend on the circumstances and jurisdiction, but they may include responsibilities to:

Perform an appropriate medical screening
Recognize signs of respiratory distress
Monitor a patient whose condition may be deteriorating
Provide stabilizing treatment when required
Follow established emergency protocols
Avoid discharging a patient whose condition remains unstable
Respond appropriately when new or worsening symptoms are reported

A poor medical outcome alone does not establish malpractice. A viable claim generally requires evidence that a healthcare provider failed to meet the applicable standard of care and that this failure caused or contributed to the patient’s injury or death.

These cases frequently require a detailed review of medical records, emergency-department policies, witness accounts, surveillance footage, diagnostic findings, medication administration records, and expert medical opinions.

When Can an Asthma-Related Death Constitute Medical Malpractice?

Not every death associated with asthma results from negligence. Even appropriate treatment cannot prevent every tragic outcome.

Medical malpractice may be a concern, however, when evidence indicates that providers failed to respond reasonably to a patient’s symptoms. Potential issues may include:

Failing to properly assess the severity of an asthma attack
Delaying medication, oxygen, respiratory support, or other treatment
Failing to monitor worsening oxygen levels
Discharging a patient before the emergency has been stabilized
Ignoring repeated reports that the patient cannot breathe
Failing to respond when a patient’s condition visibly deteriorates
Allowing assumptions or bias to influence clinical decision-making

Whether a particular event constitutes malpractice requires an individualized legal and medical investigation.

What Families Should Do After a Suspected Medical Error

Families are rarely given immediate access to every fact surrounding a hospital death. Important evidence can be difficult to identify, and some records may be retained for only a limited period.

When medical negligence is suspected, families should consider preserving:

Hospital and emergency-room records
Ambulance and emergency medical service records
Discharge instructions
Medication lists
Photographs, videos, and electronic communications
Names and contact information for witnesses
Police, security, or incident reports
Bills, insurance statements, and funeral expenses
A written timeline of what the family observed

Families should also avoid signing releases or accepting a settlement before understanding the potential scope and value of their legal claims.

Legal deadlines differ by state and by the parties involved. Claims against a government agency or public medical facility may require notice well before the ordinary statute of limitations expires. Prompt legal review can help preserve evidence and protect a family’s right to seek accountability.

What This Case Means for Georgia Families

Although Jerome White’s case arose in New Jersey, the central concern is relevant to patients and families everywhere: reports of severe breathing difficulty must be taken seriously.

Georgia medical-malpractice and wrongful-death claims are governed by specific state laws, procedural requirements, and filing deadlines. A Georgia family who suspects that a hospital, emergency department, physician, nurse, or other medical provider failed to recognize or appropriately treat respiratory distress should have the circumstances independently evaluated.

A careful investigation may determine whether the treatment met the applicable standard of care, whether an earlier intervention could have changed the outcome, and which individuals or institutions may bear legal responsibility.

Accountability Can Help Prevent Future Tragedies

Jerome White’s death is a somber reminder of the human consequences that can follow when a patient’s urgent symptoms are allegedly dismissed.

Healthcare professionals make difficult decisions under intense pressure, and not every adverse outcome is preventable. But every patient deserves to be heard, appropriately assessed, and treated without assumptions replacing medical judgment.

Accountability is not only about financial recovery. It can expose failures in patient assessment, reinforce the importance of emergency protocols, and encourage healthcare institutions to prevent similar tragedies.

Speak With an Atlanta Medical Malpractice Attorney

If you lost a loved one after a hospital, emergency department, or healthcare professional failed to recognize or appropriately respond to a medical emergency, you deserve answers.

The Edmond Firm brings extensive litigation experience and meaningful medical insight to complex medical-malpractice and wrongful-death cases. We examine the evidence, consult qualified experts, identify responsible parties, and pursue accountability with precision and resolve.

Contact The Edmond Firm to request a confidential case review. There is no cost for the initial consultation, and you pay no attorney’s fees unless compensation is recovered on your behalf, subject to the terms of your representation agreement.

When negligence occurs, “I’m sorry” is not enough.

This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal or medical advice. Reading this article or contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every matter depends on its specific facts and applicable law.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Wrong Drug Injected Into Patients’ Spines: Nashville Hospital Medication Error Injures Four

By Ashley Mills • August 31, 2026

Wrong Drug Injected Into Patients’ Spines: Nashville Hospital Medication Error Injures Four Patients preparing for joint-replacement surgery place extraordinary trust in their healthcare providers. They expect the medications selected, prepared, labeled, verified, and administered during their procedures to be correct. On August 14, 2026, that system reportedly failed at Ascension Saint Thomas Hospital Midtown in Nashville. According to the hospital, four patients scheduled for joint-replacement procedures mistakenly received potassium phosphate instead of mepivacaine, the anesthetic intended for their spinal injections. All four patients experienced adverse health reactions. One publicly identified patient, 72-year-old Glenda Dorton, was reportedly left unable to feel or move her body from the chest down. The hospital has acknowledged that a medication error occurred in its pharmacy, apologized for the resulting harm, and announced several corrective measures. State and federal regulators have reviewed the incident, and the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation opened an investigation following a referral from the Tennessee Health Facilities Commission. For patients and families, this case raises a critical question: How can the wrong medication pass through multiple layers of a hospital’s safety system and reach a patient’s spine? What Happened at Ascension Saint Thomas Midtown? Seven patients were reportedly scheduled for joint-replacement surgery at Ascension Saint Thomas Midtown on August 14. The hospital later confirmed that four of those patients received the wrong medication. Instead of receiving mepivacaine, a local anesthetic used to block pain, the patients were administered potassium phosphate. The medication was reportedly delivered through spinal injections as part of their surgical care. Ascension described the event as an isolated pharmacy medication error and stated that a comprehensive review determined that no additional patients were affected. The hospital also confirmed that the four patients experienced adverse reactions and received immediate medical treatment. One Patient Reportedly Awoke Unable to Move Glenda Dorton, a 72-year-old woman from Centerville, Tennessee, was undergoing knee-replacement surgery when she allegedly received the incorrect medication. According to statements her family provided to news organizations, the procedure initially appeared to have gone as expected. When Dorton awakened, however, she reportedly could not feel or move anything from approximately her chest—or sternum—down. She was transferred to another Ascension facility, where physicians reportedly performed an emergency procedure to drain her spinal fluid. She was also placed on a ventilator. Her family reported that she was diagnosed with a spinal cord injury around the T6 level. The hospital has acknowledged that four patients were harmed but has not publicly confirmed the individual patients’ diagnoses or long-term prognoses. Public information concerning the conditions of the other three patients remains limited. Why Is a Medication Error Involving the Spine So Dangerous? Spinal anesthesia involves placing medication near the nerves responsible for sensation and movement. Because the medication is delivered into a highly sensitive area, accuracy is essential. Mepivacaine and potassium phosphate are not interchangeable. Mepivacaine is a local anesthetic intended to interrupt nerve signals and control pain during certain procedures. Potassium phosphate is generally used to treat or prevent low phosphate levels under carefully controlled medical circumstances. When an unintended substance is introduced into or around the spinal space, it may damage neural tissue and disrupt the functions controlled by the spinal cord. Potential consequences may include: Severe neurological injury Loss of sensation Partial or complete paralysis Respiratory complications Loss of bowel or bladder function Chronic pain Reduced mobility Loss of independence The need for lifelong rehabilitation or supportive care The severity and permanence of an injury depend on multiple factors, including the substance involved, its concentration and dosage, the injection site, the patient’s condition, and how quickly the error is recognized and treated. The Hospital Acknowledged a Pharmacy Error Ascension Saint Thomas stated that its review traced the mistake to an event within the hospital pharmacy. Its public statement identified potassium phosphate as the medication mistakenly supplied in place of mepivacaine. The hospital apologized to the patients and families and said its clinical teams were continuing to provide dedicated care. Ascension also stated that it self-reported the incident to state regulators after identifying the error. The hospital subsequently announced several changes to its pharmacy and medication-safety procedures. Those measures reportedly include: Separating and distinctly marking high-alert medications Creating mandatory “hard stop” procedures when a spinal-medication scan produces an alert Requiring escalation and independent verification before proceeding Requiring a second trained pharmacist to conduct final visual and physical checks Engaging outside quality experts to review and validate the corrective-action plan These safeguards are important because serious medication errors rarely result from a single isolated action. They may involve breakdowns in storage, selection, labeling, scanning, verification, communication, or administration. How Do Wrong-Drug Errors Reach Patients? Hospitals generally use several layers of protection to prevent medication errors. A medication may pass through prescribing, pharmacy preparation, labeling, dispensing, transportation, storage, scanning, verification, and administration before it reaches a patient. An error at any one stage should ideally be caught at another. When the wrong medication is administered, investigators may need to determine whether multiple defenses failed. Potential contributing issues may include: Similar packaging or labeling Medications stored too closely together Incorrect selection from pharmacy inventory Improper preparation or compounding Incomplete or inaccurate labeling Barcode-scanning failures or overridden alerts Failure to perform an independent double-check Communication breakdowns between pharmacy and clinical teams Inadequate staffing or excessive workload Insufficient training or supervision Policies that existed on paper but were not consistently followed Technology that failed to distinguish between incompatible medications A meaningful investigation should examine the entire medication-use system—not simply identify the last person who handled the drug. Why “High-Alert” Medication Safeguards Matter Some medications present an elevated risk of catastrophic harm if they are selected or administered incorrectly. Hospitals may designate these drugs as high-alert medications and implement additional safeguards around their storage and use. Those protections can include physical separation, distinctive warning labels, restricted access, barcode verification, electronic alerts, and mandatory review by a second qualified professional. Ascension’s decision to implement isolated storage and independent dual verification after the incident suggests that these safeguards are central to preventing a similar event. However, determining exactly why the existing system failed will require reviewing the conditions and procedures in place before the four patients were injured. Corrective action after an error is essential. It does not erase the harm already suffered or answer whether reasonable precautions could have prevented it. State and Federal Authorities Are Reviewing the Incident The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation opened an investigation after receiving information from the Tennessee Health Facilities Commission. News reports indicate that the investigation remains active. Ascension has also received a survey report from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services concerning the pharmacy event. The hospital said it is cooperating with state and federal surveyors and takes the findings seriously. An investigation does not, by itself, establish criminal or civil liability. The legal system distinguishes among an unintended mistake, professional negligence, reckless conduct, and an institutional failure to maintain adequate safety systems. No criminal charges had been publicly announced at the time of publication. Is a Hospital Responsible for a Pharmacy Medication Error? A hospital may potentially be held legally responsible when the negligence of its employees, pharmacy personnel, policies, technology, or medication-management systems causes a patient’s injury. Depending on the facts and applicable law, responsibility may involve: The hospital or healthcare system A hospital pharmacy Pharmacists or pharmacy technicians Nurses or other clinical personnel Physicians or anesthesia providers Outside medication suppliers Drug-packaging or labeling companies Technology vendors responsible for defective safety systems The existence of a serious injury does not automatically prove medical malpractice. A successful claim generally requires evidence that a healthcare provider or institution failed to meet the applicable standard of care and that the failure caused or substantially contributed to the patient’s injuries. When a hospital has already acknowledged that the wrong medication was administered, major questions may remain regarding causation, institutional responsibility, the extent of each patient’s injuries, and the compensation necessary to address their future needs. The True Cost of a Catastrophic Medication Error The consequences of paralysis or a serious spinal cord injury extend far beyond the initial hospitalization. An injured patient may require: Emergency and intensive care Additional surgeries Inpatient rehabilitation Physical and occupational therapy Respiratory support Mobility equipment Home and vehicle modifications In-home nursing or attendant care Treatment for chronic pain Psychological support Assistance with daily activities Ongoing medical monitoring Replacement of lost income Long-term or lifetime care A catastrophic-injury case must evaluate not only the bills a patient has already received but also the medical, financial, and personal impact the injury is expected to have over the remainder of the patient’s life. That evaluation may require testimony from physicians, rehabilitation specialists, life-care planners, economists, vocational experts, and other qualified professionals. What Should Families Do After a Suspected Medication Error? Families may receive incomplete or changing information immediately after a serious medical event. Hospitals may conduct internal investigations, but patients should not assume that an internal review will preserve every fact necessary for an independent legal claim. Patients and families should consider taking the following steps: Request complete medical and pharmacy records Preserve medication lists and discharge instructions Document what healthcare providers said about the error Write down a detailed timeline while events remain fresh Save photographs, videos, bills, and correspondence Identify family members or other witnesses who were present Avoid signing releases without understanding their effect Consult an experienced medical-malpractice attorney promptly Evidence may include pharmacy records, medication-administration records, barcode scans, electronic alerts, surveillance footage, staffing information, internal policies, incident reports, and communications among pharmacy, nursing, surgical, and anesthesia personnel. Some of that evidence may not remain available indefinitely. What This Nashville Case Means for Georgia Patients Although this incident occurred in Tennessee, medication errors can occur in hospitals, pharmacies, surgical centers, nursing facilities, and clinics throughout Georgia. Georgia medical-malpractice claims are governed by specific procedural rules and filing deadlines. They may also require qualified expert review before a lawsuit can proceed. When a medication error produces paralysis, neurological damage, respiratory failure, or another catastrophic injury, early investigation is critical. The central questions may include: What medication was ordered? What medication was prepared and dispensed? How was it labeled and stored? Were barcode warnings generated? Were any warnings ignored or overridden? Was an independent verification required? Who had responsibility at each stage? When was the error discovered? Could earlier intervention have reduced the harm? What care will the patient require in the future? Answers to those questions can reveal whether an individual mistake, a defective process, or a broader institutional failure caused the patient’s injuries. Patient Safety Requires More Than an Apology Ascension’s apology and corrective measures acknowledge the seriousness of what occurred. But for patients living with potentially permanent injuries, an apology cannot restore mobility, independence, health, or peace of mind. Hospitals have a responsibility to build medication systems that anticipate human error and prevent a single mistake from reaching a patient. When those systems fail, accountability matters—not only for the people harmed, but also for every patient who enters a hospital expecting safe care. Injured by a Medication Error? Contact The Edmond Firm If you or someone you love suffered paralysis, neurological damage, respiratory failure, or another serious injury because the wrong medication was administered, you deserve a clear explanation of what happened. The Edmond Firm brings extensive legal experience and meaningful medical insight to complex medical-malpractice and catastrophic-injury cases. We examine the complete chain of care, identify the individuals and institutions responsible, consult qualified experts, and pursue the compensation our clients need to move forward. Contact The Edmond Firm to request a confidential case review at no cost. Attorney’s fees are collected only if compensation is recovered, subject to the terms of the representation agreement. When negligence occurs, “I’m sorry” is not enough. This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or medical advice. Results depend on the facts and law applicable to each case. Reading this article or contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship.