How Medical Negligence During Labor and Delivery Can Cause Birth Injuries

September 23, 2026

Labor and delivery require close observation, sound clinical judgment, and timely communication among healthcare providers. A mother's condition and a baby's response can change quickly, creating a narrow window for treatment. When providers fail to recognize warning signs or respond appropriately, a manageable complication may lead to serious harm.


Not every birth injury is caused by medical negligence. Complications may occur despite appropriate care, and some conditions develop before labor begins. When substandard care causes injury, however, medical malpractice lawyers can assess whether the family may have grounds for a claim.


When a Poor Outcome May Involve Medical Negligence

A difficult birth and medical malpractice are not the same. A claim generally depends on whether a provider failed to use the skill and care expected under the circumstances and thereby caused or worsened an injury. Clinical information, timing, and response often distinguish an unavoidable outcome from a preventable one.

According to Forbes, avoidable mistakes occur in an estimated 3% to 15% of medical interventions. That range does not establish negligence in a particular delivery, but it shows why an unexpected injury may warrant closer examination. For medical malpractice lawyers, the central questions are what providers knew, what accepted care required, and whether a proper response probably would have prevented the harm.


Failure to Recognize Signs of Fetal Distress

Fetal heart-rate patterns can provide important information about how a baby is tolerating labor. Certain changes may indicate that the baby is not receiving enough oxygen or is struggling with contractions. A single reading may be less meaningful than a pattern that develops over time. Providers must interpret those patterns alongside other clinical findings and respond when the circumstances call for intervention.


Negligence may be at issue when staff fail to monitor as required, misinterpret concerning changes, or do not communicate an urgent finding. A delayed response can allow impaired oxygen or blood flow to continue. Depending on its severity, oxygen deprivation may contribute to brain injury, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, developmental impairment, or cerebral palsy, although these conditions can have unrelated causes.


Delayed Decisions About Emergency Delivery

Some complications require a quick decision about whether labor can safely continue. A prolapsed umbilical cord, placental separation, uterine rupture, or persistent fetal distress may interrupt the baby's oxygen supply and require prompt delivery. Harmful delay may follow when staff do not escalate concerning information or prepare for an emergency cesarean delivery in time.


A cesarean delivery does not, by itself, show whether the response was timely. Evaluating that timing may require medical malpractice lawyers to examine when intervention became necessary, how providers responded, and whether an earlier delivery likely would have changed the outcome. Monitoring records, orders, nursing notes, operating-room documentation, and the baby's condition can help establish that sequence.


Medication and Labor-Management Errors

Medications may be used to induce labor, strengthen contractions, control pain, or address complications. A drug that increases contractions can also place added stress on the baby, so careful dosing and observation may be necessary. Excessively frequent or prolonged contractions may call for a medication adjustment and other appropriate measures.


An incorrect dose or failure to respond to unsafe contractions can expose both patients to added risk. Other errors may involve overlooked allergies, drug interactions, or poor communication about what was given. Each detail places the medication decision within the full course of labor. The ultimate issue is whether the medication's selection, administration, and monitoring met the standard of care and whether any departure caused the injury.


Mishandling Shoulder Dystocia and Difficult Deliveries

Shoulder dystocia occurs when a baby's shoulder becomes lodged after the head has emerged, creating an obstetric emergency. It can occur without negligence, and providers may have to use recognized maneuvers to complete the delivery. The manner and timing of the response matter because excessive force or inappropriate traction may injure the nerves that control movement and sensation in the arm.


A brachial plexus injury can lead to weakness, reduced motion, or paralysis in the affected arm; Erb's palsy is one form. Difficult deliveries may also involve fractures or other trauma. Because these injuries do not necessarily prove improper handling, delivery records, provider accounts, and newborn findings can help medical malpractice lawyers compare the response with accepted practice.


Improper Use of Forceps or Vacuum Assistance

Forceps and vacuum devices may be used in certain assisted deliveries, but their use calls for appropriate clinical judgment and careful technique. Providers must consider whether the circumstances support an assisted delivery, whether the baby is positioned suitably, and whether continued attempts remain appropriate. Problems can arise when a device is placed incorrectly, excessive force is applied, or unsuccessful attempts continue instead of moving to another necessary intervention.


Misuse may cause head trauma, bleeding, nerve damage, skull injury, or other harm. Yet the presence of a mark, bruise, or complication does not by itself establish malpractice. The number and duration of attempts, device placement, documented indications, and the condition of the mother and baby help show whether the care was reasonable.


Failure to Address Maternal Warning Signs

Protecting the baby during labor also requires attention to the mother's condition. Changes in blood pressure, bleeding, fever, oxygen levels, or other vital signs may signal a complication that affects both patients. If providers dismiss symptoms, fail to order an appropriate evaluation, or delay treatment, the underlying problem may progress and interfere with the baby's oxygen or blood supply.


Communication failures can compound the danger. A nurse may document a change without promptly notifying a physician, or information may be lost during a shift change. In a possible claim, the sequence of observations, communications, orders, and responses can help medical malpractice lawyers determine whether a missed maternal warning sign contributed to the birth injury.


Connecting the Medical Error to the Child's Injury

Proving that care fell below the standard is only part of a malpractice case. The evidence must also connect that failure to the child's condition. This can be challenging when an injury may have several possible causes, when symptoms emerge gradually, or when prenatal factors could explain the outcome.


Medical records can help reconstruct the progression of labor and the newborn's condition. Fetal monitoring strips, medication records, imaging, laboratory findings, cord-blood results, delivery notes, and neonatal treatment records may reveal when an injury likely occurred. Qualified medical professionals may assist medical malpractice lawyers by explaining the applicable standard of care, identifying a departure, and evaluating whether that departure caused the harm.


How a Birth Injury Can Affect a Family

The effects of a birth injury may extend well beyond the delivery room. A child may experience impaired movement, weakness, developmental delays, communication difficulties, seizures, or other long-term complications, depending on the nature and severity of the harm. Families may face continuing medical treatment, rehabilitation, assistive needs, changes to daily routines, and uncertainty about the child's future care.


A legal claim may consider both the immediate injury and its lasting consequences. Relevant losses can include medical expenses, future care needs, lost income, and pain and suffering when the law permits their recovery. Careful evaluation matters because the full impact may not be clear from the initial diagnosis alone.


After a traumatic delivery, families may question whether providers missed warning signs, intervened too late, or could have prevented the injury. A detailed review of the evidence allows medical malpractice lawyers to evaluate the providers' conduct, reconstruct the sequence of events, and assess the connection to the resulting harm. At The Edmond Firm, we combine medical knowledge with legal experience to investigate birth-injury claims and explain the options the evidence may support. Contact us to discuss whether the circumstances surrounding your child's delivery may support a medical malpractice case.

By Ashley Mills August 31, 2026
Wrong Drug Injected Into Patients’ Spines: Nashville Hospital Medication Error Injures Four Patients preparing for joint-replacement surgery place extraordinary trust in their healthcare providers. They expect the medications selected, prepared, labeled, verified, and administered during their procedures to be correct. On August 14, 2026, that system reportedly failed at Ascension Saint Thomas Hospital Midtown in Nashville. According to the hospital, four patients scheduled for joint-replacement procedures mistakenly received potassium phosphate instead of mepivacaine, the anesthetic intended for their spinal injections. All four patients experienced adverse health reactions. One publicly identified patient, 72-year-old Glenda Dorton, was reportedly left unable to feel or move her body from the chest down. The hospital has acknowledged that a medication error occurred in its pharmacy, apologized for the resulting harm, and announced several corrective measures. State and federal regulators have reviewed the incident, and the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation opened an investigation following a referral from the Tennessee Health Facilities Commission. For patients and families, this case raises a critical question: How can the wrong medication pass through multiple layers of a hospital’s safety system and reach a patient’s spine? What Happened at Ascension Saint Thomas Midtown? Seven patients were reportedly scheduled for joint-replacement surgery at Ascension Saint Thomas Midtown on August 14. The hospital later confirmed that four of those patients received the wrong medication. Instead of receiving mepivacaine, a local anesthetic used to block pain, the patients were administered potassium phosphate. The medication was reportedly delivered through spinal injections as part of their surgical care. Ascension described the event as an isolated pharmacy medication error and stated that a comprehensive review determined that no additional patients were affected. The hospital also confirmed that the four patients experienced adverse reactions and received immediate medical treatment. One Patient Reportedly Awoke Unable to Move Glenda Dorton, a 72-year-old woman from Centerville, Tennessee, was undergoing knee-replacement surgery when she allegedly received the incorrect medication. According to statements her family provided to news organizations, the procedure initially appeared to have gone as expected. When Dorton awakened, however, she reportedly could not feel or move anything from approximately her chest—or sternum—down. She was transferred to another Ascension facility, where physicians reportedly performed an emergency procedure to drain her spinal fluid. She was also placed on a ventilator. Her family reported that she was diagnosed with a spinal cord injury around the T6 level. The hospital has acknowledged that four patients were harmed but has not publicly confirmed the individual patients’ diagnoses or long-term prognoses. Public information concerning the conditions of the other three patients remains limited. Why Is a Medication Error Involving the Spine So Dangerous? Spinal anesthesia involves placing medication near the nerves responsible for sensation and movement. Because the medication is delivered into a highly sensitive area, accuracy is essential. Mepivacaine and potassium phosphate are not interchangeable. Mepivacaine is a local anesthetic intended to interrupt nerve signals and control pain during certain procedures. Potassium phosphate is generally used to treat or prevent low phosphate levels under carefully controlled medical circumstances. When an unintended substance is introduced into or around the spinal space, it may damage neural tissue and disrupt the functions controlled by the spinal cord. Potential consequences may include: Severe neurological injury Loss of sensation Partial or complete paralysis Respiratory complications Loss of bowel or bladder function Chronic pain Reduced mobility Loss of independence The need for lifelong rehabilitation or supportive care The severity and permanence of an injury depend on multiple factors, including the substance involved, its concentration and dosage, the injection site, the patient’s condition, and how quickly the error is recognized and treated. The Hospital Acknowledged a Pharmacy Error Ascension Saint Thomas stated that its review traced the mistake to an event within the hospital pharmacy. Its public statement identified potassium phosphate as the medication mistakenly supplied in place of mepivacaine. The hospital apologized to the patients and families and said its clinical teams were continuing to provide dedicated care. Ascension also stated that it self-reported the incident to state regulators after identifying the error. The hospital subsequently announced several changes to its pharmacy and medication-safety procedures. Those measures reportedly include: Separating and distinctly marking high-alert medications Creating mandatory “hard stop” procedures when a spinal-medication scan produces an alert Requiring escalation and independent verification before proceeding Requiring a second trained pharmacist to conduct final visual and physical checks Engaging outside quality experts to review and validate the corrective-action plan These safeguards are important because serious medication errors rarely result from a single isolated action. They may involve breakdowns in storage, selection, labeling, scanning, verification, communication, or administration. How Do Wrong-Drug Errors Reach Patients? Hospitals generally use several layers of protection to prevent medication errors. A medication may pass through prescribing, pharmacy preparation, labeling, dispensing, transportation, storage, scanning, verification, and administration before it reaches a patient. An error at any one stage should ideally be caught at another. When the wrong medication is administered, investigators may need to determine whether multiple defenses failed. Potential contributing issues may include: Similar packaging or labeling Medications stored too closely together Incorrect selection from pharmacy inventory Improper preparation or compounding Incomplete or inaccurate labeling Barcode-scanning failures or overridden alerts Failure to perform an independent double-check Communication breakdowns between pharmacy and clinical teams Inadequate staffing or excessive workload Insufficient training or supervision Policies that existed on paper but were not consistently followed Technology that failed to distinguish between incompatible medications A meaningful investigation should examine the entire medication-use system—not simply identify the last person who handled the drug. Why “High-Alert” Medication Safeguards Matter Some medications present an elevated risk of catastrophic harm if they are selected or administered incorrectly. Hospitals may designate these drugs as high-alert medications and implement additional safeguards around their storage and use. Those protections can include physical separation, distinctive warning labels, restricted access, barcode verification, electronic alerts, and mandatory review by a second qualified professional. Ascension’s decision to implement isolated storage and independent dual verification after the incident suggests that these safeguards are central to preventing a similar event. However, determining exactly why the existing system failed will require reviewing the conditions and procedures in place before the four patients were injured. Corrective action after an error is essential. It does not erase the harm already suffered or answer whether reasonable precautions could have prevented it. State and Federal Authorities Are Reviewing the Incident The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation opened an investigation after receiving information from the Tennessee Health Facilities Commission. News reports indicate that the investigation remains active. Ascension has also received a survey report from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services concerning the pharmacy event. The hospital said it is cooperating with state and federal surveyors and takes the findings seriously. An investigation does not, by itself, establish criminal or civil liability. The legal system distinguishes among an unintended mistake, professional negligence, reckless conduct, and an institutional failure to maintain adequate safety systems. No criminal charges had been publicly announced at the time of publication. Is a Hospital Responsible for a Pharmacy Medication Error? A hospital may potentially be held legally responsible when the negligence of its employees, pharmacy personnel, policies, technology, or medication-management systems causes a patient’s injury. Depending on the facts and applicable law, responsibility may involve: The hospital or healthcare system A hospital pharmacy Pharmacists or pharmacy technicians Nurses or other clinical personnel Physicians or anesthesia providers Outside medication suppliers Drug-packaging or labeling companies Technology vendors responsible for defective safety systems The existence of a serious injury does not automatically prove medical malpractice. A successful claim generally requires evidence that a healthcare provider or institution failed to meet the applicable standard of care and that the failure caused or substantially contributed to the patient’s injuries. When a hospital has already acknowledged that the wrong medication was administered, major questions may remain regarding causation, institutional responsibility, the extent of each patient’s injuries, and the compensation necessary to address their future needs. The True Cost of a Catastrophic Medication Error The consequences of paralysis or a serious spinal cord injury extend far beyond the initial hospitalization. An injured patient may require: Emergency and intensive care Additional surgeries Inpatient rehabilitation Physical and occupational therapy Respiratory support Mobility equipment Home and vehicle modifications In-home nursing or attendant care Treatment for chronic pain Psychological support Assistance with daily activities Ongoing medical monitoring Replacement of lost income Long-term or lifetime care A catastrophic-injury case must evaluate not only the bills a patient has already received but also the medical, financial, and personal impact the injury is expected to have over the remainder of the patient’s life. That evaluation may require testimony from physicians, rehabilitation specialists, life-care planners, economists, vocational experts, and other qualified professionals. What Should Families Do After a Suspected Medication Error? Families may receive incomplete or changing information immediately after a serious medical event. Hospitals may conduct internal investigations, but patients should not assume that an internal review will preserve every fact necessary for an independent legal claim. Patients and families should consider taking the following steps: Request complete medical and pharmacy records Preserve medication lists and discharge instructions Document what healthcare providers said about the error Write down a detailed timeline while events remain fresh Save photographs, videos, bills, and correspondence Identify family members or other witnesses who were present Avoid signing releases without understanding their effect Consult an experienced medical-malpractice attorney promptly Evidence may include pharmacy records, medication-administration records, barcode scans, electronic alerts, surveillance footage, staffing information, internal policies, incident reports, and communications among pharmacy, nursing, surgical, and anesthesia personnel. Some of that evidence may not remain available indefinitely. What This Nashville Case Means for Georgia Patients Although this incident occurred in Tennessee, medication errors can occur in hospitals, pharmacies, surgical centers, nursing facilities, and clinics throughout Georgia. Georgia medical-malpractice claims are governed by specific procedural rules and filing deadlines. They may also require qualified expert review before a lawsuit can proceed. When a medication error produces paralysis, neurological damage, respiratory failure, or another catastrophic injury, early investigation is critical. The central questions may include: What medication was ordered? What medication was prepared and dispensed? How was it labeled and stored? Were barcode warnings generated? Were any warnings ignored or overridden? Was an independent verification required? Who had responsibility at each stage? When was the error discovered? Could earlier intervention have reduced the harm? What care will the patient require in the future? Answers to those questions can reveal whether an individual mistake, a defective process, or a broader institutional failure caused the patient’s injuries. Patient Safety Requires More Than an Apology Ascension’s apology and corrective measures acknowledge the seriousness of what occurred. But for patients living with potentially permanent injuries, an apology cannot restore mobility, independence, health, or peace of mind. Hospitals have a responsibility to build medication systems that anticipate human error and prevent a single mistake from reaching a patient. When those systems fail, accountability matters—not only for the people harmed, but also for every patient who enters a hospital expecting safe care. Injured by a Medication Error? Contact The Edmond Firm If you or someone you love suffered paralysis, neurological damage, respiratory failure, or another serious injury because the wrong medication was administered, you deserve a clear explanation of what happened. The Edmond Firm brings extensive legal experience and meaningful medical insight to complex medical-malpractice and catastrophic-injury cases. We examine the complete chain of care, identify the individuals and institutions responsible, consult qualified experts, and pursue the compensation our clients need to move forward. Contact The Edmond Firm to request a confidential case review at no cost. Attorney’s fees are collected only if compensation is recovered, subject to the terms of the representation agreement. When negligence occurs, “I’m sorry” is not enough. This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or medical advice. Results depend on the facts and law applicable to each case. Reading this article or contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By Ashley Mills August 31, 2026
Hospital Allegedly Dismissed Father’s Asthma Emergency Before His Death
malpractice attorneys
August 19, 2026
Understanding the timeline of a malpractice case isn't always straightforward. Join your local malpractice attorneys as we walk through the process with you!
medical malpractice lawyers
July 22, 2026
Medical malpractice lawyers face shifting legal strategies and rising insurance costs as nuclear verdicts dramatically reshape claims.
By Ashley Mills July 14, 2026
Injured in a commercial trucking accident in Atlanta or elsewhere in Georgia? Learn who may be responsible, what evidence matters, and how The Edmond Firm can help.
By Ashley Mills June 23, 2026
You'll find The Edmond Firm where medicine meets the law.
malpractice law
June 18, 2026
Ultimately, proficiency in malpractice law provides clients with the advocacy necessary to challenge powerful medical institutions and insurance corporations.
The Edmond Firm poster: “Meet the interns” with three staff photos and names, “Summer 2021!”
By Ashley Mills June 12, 2026
The Edmond Firm welcomes Its 2026 Summer Interns.
medical malpractice attorney
May 21, 2026
The road to justice after a healthcare error can be long and complex. See what to expect and why having a medical malpractice attorney is essential for success.
medical malpractice lawyer
February 23, 2026
Discover 7 reasons why you should never settle without consulting a medical malpractice lawyer to protect your rights and claim.